美球迷贊詹皇總決賽場均32+三雙，63%TS，這表現失冠也不該被指責

美國JRS之聲

美球迷贊詹皇總決賽場均32+三雙，63%TS，這表現失冠也不該被指責

LeBron is now averaging 32/11.8/10.5 on 63 TS% this finals (self.nba)

勒布朗這輪總決賽里目前場均32+11.8+10.5，真實命中率63%

[–]Jija45 710 指標 12小時前

At. THIRTY TWO YEARS OLD.

在32歲的時候打出這種數據

[–]Shit_Fuck_Cunt_Face 339 指標 11小時前

Averaging one point per year old he is. Can"t wait to see him in his forties

年均老一分，等不及看到樂邦40歲的樣子了。

[–]okaycoolokaybool 402 指標 11小時前

oh my god lebron doesn"t decline

LeIncline

沃勒個天吶，勒布朗根本就不會衰退，

勒增長。

[–]NBAzxc123zxc123 77 指標 8小時前

Except his hairline. It"s declined a bit.

但他的髮際線會衰退，已經衰退了一些了。

[–]Cavaliers BandwagonRytlock9 61 指標 6小時前

don"t let that distract you from the fact that KD is balder than LeBron, and that a group of 3-1 lead blowers is all together in the same team, leading 3-1.

別因為這就讓你忘記了杜蘭特比勒布朗頭禿得更厲害，而一群3-1領先崩盤的人聚集了在一起，現在正以3-1領先。

[–]probation_420 91 指標 5小時前

Please. If there is a god, let the warriors blow this lead.

Think of the memes.

求老天顯靈啊，讓勇士再次領先崩盤吧。

想想看到時候各種梗。

[–]dropdatdurkadurk 87 指標 7小時前

Most impressive thing of all is the Warriors have a NEGATIVE net rating when LeBron is on the court. THAT Warriors team with 4 top 15 players are getting outscored when LeBron is on the court. Just absurd

最讓人印象深刻的是，當勒布朗在場上時，勇士球員都是負的凈效率值， 這支勇士可是有著4名聯盟前15的球員啊，而勒布朗在場時的得分卻比他們都高。 太逆天了。

[–]NuggetsTuggMahog 44 指標 6小時前

I agree that is what has been both most impressive with LeBron this series. He is helping his team outscore the Warriors and the warriors are still up 3-1. LeBron deserves no shame from this Finals regardless of the outcome.

我同意，這就是勒布朗這個系列賽最讓人服氣的地方。他幫他的球隊在得分上領先勇士，而勇士卻仍然3-1領先。 不管最後輸贏，勒布朗根本沒有什麼可羞愧的地方。

[–]RocketsAdmiralAtLaw 43 指標 8小時前

And that doesn"t really tell the story. If you compare the mintues he has played, he has the mileage of a player that would be 36-37 years old.

We keep talking about Kawhi as a robot, but someone should probably do a metal detector test on LeBron too.

這還不能體現全部的故事。如果你比較一下勒布朗所出場的時間，他現在的耗損度會是36-37歲球員的水平。 我們一直在說倫納德是個機器人，但真的也該用金屬探測器檢查下勒布朗了。

[–]bangbangthreehunna 23 指標 8小時前*

It"s wild to think he led that 2007 Cavs team to the finals over the Pistons, at 22 years old.

瘋狂的是2007年勒布朗帶領著騎士越過活塞殺進了總決賽， 在22歲的時候就做到了。

[–]theflamboyantV 302 指標 12小時前

What a skrub, couldn"t even do this in the regular season like that ninja turtle from okc

真是個渣渣，勒布朗甚至沒法在常規賽里像人家俄城忍者神龜那樣做到這個數據（30+三雙）

[–]Celticslargetoes 109 指標 9小時前

Russell Wilson?

你說的可是拉塞爾-威爾森？

[–]Nuggets Bandwagon12aragon 41 指標 8小時前

Wilson Chandler?

威爾森-錢德勒 ?

[–]Lakers Bandwagonjtn1123 32 指標 7小時前

Chandler Parsons?

錢德勒-帕森斯？

[–]San Diego Clippersjalen126 24 指標 8小時前

Brain Westbrook?

頭腦不發熱版威斯布魯克？

[–]RANDYFLOSS 68 指標 7小時前*

Skip Bayless " 32 points? - Only a 32 point average-triple double in the finals? J o r d a n would likely have had 254 points, and what"s this 11.8 assist stuff about? Jordan (o h y e a a a a a a, MJ ;)) would"ve definitely rounded that up to 12 assists per game"

美國瑜伽：「32分？總決賽才場均32分的三雙？喬丹的話會得到254分， 11.8助攻什麼鬼？喬丹絕壁會打出場均12助攻！」

[–]WhyAmIStillOnline 122 指標 9小時前*

When comparing all-time greats, a thing that comes up is their Finals record. "Oh, LeBron"s gone 3-4 and Jordan went 6-0." I get it, but I feel like if LeBron"s playing like this and they lose, I don"t think he deserves a point in the loss column. When he"s playing like this, he is the last one to blame. This may be controversial, but I think he should be looked at as being 3-1 in the Finals right now. 07 his team was garbage and he was the only reason why they were there at all, 14 he"s really the only one who showed up consistently and the Spurs put on one the greatest team performances of all time, and 15 Kyrie and Kevin got injured and he played so well people thought he should"ve been given Finals MVP despite losing. The only loss I"d keep is against the Mavs. He simply underperformed.

當比較歷史級偉大球員時，一項會提到的事情就是總決賽紀錄。 「噢，勒布朗3冠4亞，喬丹6冠0亞。」道理我懂，但我感覺如果勒布朗打出這樣的表現而他們輸球，我不會覺得他該受到一記減分項。當他打出這種表現時，他應該是最不該受到指責的人。這麼說可能會有爭議，但我覺得他現在應該被看作是總決賽3勝1負的成績。07年他的球隊是渣渣，他是球隊殺進總決賽的唯一原因，14年他是球隊唯一穩定挺身而出的人，15年歐文和樂福都受傷了，而他打得非常出色，人們都覺得他應該作為負方當選FMVP。唯一的失利是對小牛那次，那次他表現就是爛沒得說。

[–]Cavaliers BandwagonCanadian_Weatherman 98 指標 8小時前

I don"t understand why losing a Finals is seen as a negative. Just getting there is awfully difficult and an achivement in itself, and an acheivement LeBron has accomplished more often than Jordan.

Like, if LeBron finishes his career 6-4, and Jordan is 6-0, then LeBron has had more playoff success.

我不理解為什麼輸掉總決賽會被看作是負面的成績， 光是打進總決賽本身就是超級有難度很了不起的成交了， 勒布朗這項上已經比喬丹進總決賽次數更多了。

就好比，如果勒布朗生涯6勝4負，喬丹6勝0負，那麼勒布朗季後賽取得的成功是更多的。

[–]76ersnewguy4000 69 指標 8小時前

If lebron finishes 4-4 after this year I"m ready to call him the GOAT

如果勒布朗今年做到總決賽4冠4亞，我已經準備好稱他為歷史第一人了。

[–]Cavaliers BandwagonAlcoholicInsomniac 46 指標 7小時前

I don"t see how he can do it, but if he does it"d be incredible.

我不覺得勒布朗能做到翻盤，但如果他真做到了，那就太逆天了。

[–][BOS] E"Twaun Moorepokexchespin 21 指標 7小時前

Definitely, coming back from 3-0 alone is ridiculous, but doing so against a team with two top four players, a ridiculous defensive beast and great passer, and THE three and D player with a solid bench is just one of the most impressive feats in all of sports

必須的。光是0-3能做到翻盤就很逆天了，而如果面對」擁有兩名聯盟前4的球員，一個防守野獸和出色的傳球手，一個3D球員，加上不錯的替補的球隊」做到這點，這會是所有體育史上最讓人服氣的表現。

喜歡這篇文章嗎？立刻分享出去讓更多人知道吧！