面對俄羅斯威脅，美國稱「將保留自衛的權利」，國外網友：自衛！

最新 06-26

The White House told Russia on Monday that it reserves the right to self defense after the Kremlin warned it would track US-led coalition aircraft in Syria as potential targets and halted an incident-prevention hotline with Washington after US forces downed a Syrian jet.

克里姆林宮警告說，它將追蹤美國領導的在敘利亞的作戰飛機並將其作為潛在的「目標」（標靶），並在美國軍隊擊落一架敘利亞政府軍飛機後，停止與華盛頓的緊急事件預防熱線。之後，白宮在周一告訴俄羅斯，美方將保留「自衛權」。

I think that the escalation of hostilities among the many factions that are operating in this region doesn t help anybody White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said and the Syrian regime and the others in the regime need to understand that we will retain the right to self defense of coalition forces aligned against ISIS.

「我認為，在這個地區的許多派別之間的敵對行動升級，並沒有幫助到任何人。」白宮新聞秘書肖恩·斯派塞說：「敘利亞當局和其他政權中的人需要明白，我們將保護與ISIS對抗的團體的自衛權。」

Spicer told a reporter later that he was not saying the US is on the brink of war with Russia amid an escalation in tensions that came after the Syrian government attacked a US-backed group that is fighting ISIS.

斯派塞後來告訴記者，他並沒有表示美國正處於與俄羅斯的戰爭邊緣。儘管俄羅斯支持的敘利亞政府襲擊了美國支持的與ISIS戰鬥的團體，導致緊張局勢進一步升級。

The US says an SU-22 operated by the Syrian regime was dropping bombs on the Syrian Democratic Forces when it was shot out of the sky by a U.S. F/A-18E Super Hornet.

美方稱，由敘利亞政府軍操作的蘇22在被美國F / A-18E超級大黃蜂擊落時，正在向敘利亞民主力量部隊投擲炸彈。

網友評論

xredsx tilbury United Kingdom 14 hours ago

Self defence is when you are in your own territory being attacked.

自衛是指當你在自己的領土受到攻擊時。

james none United Kingdom 9 hours ago

Albanianguy33: The democratically elected government of Syria asked Russia for help. They did not however ask the US or UK for help.

阿爾巴尼亞人33：民主選舉的敘利亞政府要求俄羅斯提供幫助。然而，他們沒有用任何一種方式，要求美國或英國的幫助。

CITIZEN London United Kingdom 2 hours ago

Russia is officially invited by the sovereign Syrian government to fight terrorsrists US is NOT.

俄羅斯正式受到敘利亞主權政府的邀請，去打擊恐怖分子，美國並沒得到邀請。

Bill from Bucks High Wycombe 14 hours ago

Of course the U.S.is not being provocative at all. Supporting anti government forces on Syria s soil without any permission to be there if that s not provocative then what is. Shameful bullying behaviour.

當然，美國根本沒有挑釁。如果在沒得到任何允許的情況下，在敘利亞的土地上支持反政府武裝都不算挑釁那什麼才叫？可恥的欺凌惡棍行為！

Qalupalik London United Kingdom 12 hours ago

No it is actually a war crime as an act of aggression and has the potential to lead to wide scale loss of life. All for the greed which is endemic to American Exceptionalism.

不，這實際上是戰爭罪行和侵略行徑，有可能會導致大量的人員傷亡。

這一切都是因為「美國例外主義」里所充斥的貪婪。

lyn lalalalaland United Kingdom 12 hours ago

Trump needs to prove he is not in putins pocket. Job done.

特朗普需要證明他沒有被普京收買。於是他就上演了這一齣戲碼，任務完成。

Pauleta Paris France 14 hours ago

The US ruining people s lives all around the world since 1945 thanks for nothing!

自從1945年以來，美國在全世界到處破壞他國人民的生活。還真是多謝你們了啊！

Alex Silent Saint Petersburg Russia 11 hours ago

France and Germany were allies during WW2.

在二戰中，法國和德國是盟友。

Feddup Yorkshire United Kingdom 1 hour ago

Meh... Northern Virginia ==== WW1 - Your troops were so ill-prepared they did not see action until June 1918 and had to borrow weapons from France and the UK. Pershing sent men over the top on human wave attacks even when advised not to by the British & French. WW2 --- Did not see action until November 1942 and were supported by the Royal Navy and RAF. They were not considered very effective in the face of a determined enemy resistance. On D-Day the US generals ignored all offers of specialist vehicles (Hobart s Funnies ) and advice from the British deciding they knew better. Omaha Beach would have benefited considerably. (US cas (Omaha only) = 6000; British& Canadian cas (Sword Juno Gold) = 2500)

北維吉利亞，第一次世界大戰，你們的軍隊太弱了，直到1918年6月前都沒有看到有什麼行動，而不得不向英法借武器。帕欣沒有接受英法的勸告派人發起人海攻擊。二戰期間，直到1942年11月才採取行動，而且得到了皇家海軍和空軍的支持。在面對敵人的頑強抵抗下，美國顯得力不從心。在諾曼底登陸那一天，美國拒絕接受特種車輛（霍巴特坦克），也決絕英國的建議，認為自己更了解情況。否則奧馬哈海灘登陸會取得更大戰果。美國傷亡（僅僅在奧馬哈海灘）達到6000人，英國和加拿大加起來2500人。

Kim Rong Un Pyongyang Spain 12 hours ago

Why is the US attacking a country that is fighting daesh?

為什麼美國攻擊同ISIS戰鬥的國家？

HarveyHK Hong Kong Hong Kong 3 hours ago

Because Assad wont let the yanks have their pipeline thru Syria. thus allowing them to compete against Putin s stranglehold on gas and oil supplies into Europe. So Assad has to go at whatever the cost. That cost would appear to be unleashing ISIS on Assad (and the rest of the world).

美國想要讓自己的油氣管道途經敘利亞，這樣美國就可以挑戰俄羅斯對歐洲油氣供應的壟斷。

因為阿薩德不讓美國這樣做，所以美國就要不惜一切代價地推翻阿薩德。

而代價似乎就是把「伊斯蘭國」極端組織放出來對付阿薩德，同時也殃及到世界其他國家。

Judge Dredd Aberdeen 2 hours ago

Because Daesh (ISIS) and the US are one.

因為「伊斯蘭國」極端組織與美國就是一丘之貉啊。

Qualified Expert Newcastle United Kingdom 13 hours ago

Western troops out leave ISIS to Vlad.

西方軍隊滾出敘利亞吧，讓普京來收拾「伊斯蘭國」極端組織。

UrsaM Exeter United Kingdom 12 hours ago

Put them in a Gulag. U

把這些極端組織的恐怖分子關進「古拉格」式的集中營。

Al Douane Martintown Canada 12 hours ago

At least with Assadthe Christians in Syria are protected.

至少在阿薩德的治下，敘利亞的基督徒是受到保護的。

UrsaM Exeter United Kingdom 12 hours ago

Spot on. Cant understand why the Bible thumping US has done a deal with the wahabis.

說到點子上去了。我不理解基督教氛圍狂熱的美國怎麼會與瓦哈比教派的人做交易。

mikevienna wien Austria 12 hours ago

The US is providing air cover for rebel forces just as they did in Libya. They didn t turn out well either why don t they learn? It s not self defence they shouldn t be there.

正像在利比亞那樣，美國為叛軍提供空中掩護。

在利比亞這麼乾的結果並不好，為什麼美國人就不懂得吸取教訓呢？

美國不是在進行自衛，他們不該出現在敘利亞。

Burnt Land of oz United States 12 hours ago

When your stupid it s harder to learn

如果你很蠢，就不容易吸取教訓吧。

Vesi Murmansk Russia 13 hours ago

The irony a Vietnam draft dodger afraid to scar his pretty face in the war now wants to start a war where he will send young men to die defending a faction that later will turn against the US.

諷刺的是越南膽小鬼害怕在戰爭中劃傷了他漂亮的臉蛋，現在卻想發動一場戰爭，將派出年輕人來誓死捍衛一個後來會對抗美國的派別。

MellowB1rd Surrey United Kingdom 14 hours ago

We are in a worse situation than we were during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

我們正處於比我們在古巴導彈危機期間更糟糕的局面。

null 13 hours ago

Slight exaggeration!

稍微誇張了點！

Tubby Slough United Kingdom 13 hours ago

All off the back of the deal he made with the Saudis.

所有這一切的背後是他與沙烏地阿拉伯的交易。

MellowB1rd Surrey United Kingdom 13 hours ago

I think President Trump played a double bluff. Take Saudi money and dont give them the arms. Look to what is happening in Qatar thousands of Turkish troops there waiting for something. American ships in Qatary ports. I think we might be about to go after the very heartbeat of isis. And that is Saudi. I think we are on for w w 3.

我認為特朗普總統打了雙重虛張聲勢。拿沙特的錢，但是沒有給他們武器。看看卡達發生了什麼，成千上萬的土耳其軍隊在那裡等著什麼。美國艦隊停靠在卡達的港口。我想我們可能要去打擊真正的ISIS。那就是沙烏地阿拉伯。我想我們是在準備三戰。

ichina21小編微信：chentuo1218

關注國外網友看中國做理性愛國者

1、想要進微信群的朋友，可以加管理員微信後，發送驗證：我是ichina21的讀者，管理員將把你拉進群；

管理員1：徐小仙微信號：xuxiaoxian111

管理員2：坨坨微信號：chentuo1218

管理員3：卧龍微信號：wolong89

（進群後請修改昵稱為昵稱-城市-語言，並打招呼）

2、由於有很多營銷號、掛機號趁機加入群，因此小編會對群不定期進行清理，進群請大家自覺打招呼，進群後3分鐘之內不打招呼的，小編和管理員將會暫時踢除；

3、因以上規則被錯踢得可以再次申請，敬請諒解；

4、學習第一交流第二謝絕人身攻擊；

喜歡這篇文章嗎？立刻分享出去讓更多人知道吧！