蘋果將Telegram從App Store下架

Telegram"s official app has been removed from Apple"s App Store.

Telegram的官方App已從蘋果的App Store下架。

It had been removed because it had made "inappropriate content" available to users, founder Pavel Durov said.

據它的創始人帕維爾·杜羅表示，被下架的原因是向用戶提供了「不適當內容」。

"Once we have protections in place we expect the apps to be back on the App Store," he tweeted.

「一旦我們找到了保護措施，我們希望這款App可以重回App Store。」他在推特中寫道。

The removal came soon after Telegram launched an unfinished version of its "experimental" Telegram X app. Apple took down both the official messaging app and the one still being worked on.

此次下架發生於Telegram發布了一個未完成的「實驗性」版本——Telegram X之後。Apple同時下架了官方App和這一款仍在開發的App。

We were alerted by Apple that inappropriate content was made available to our users and both apps were taken off the App Store. Once we have protections in place we expect the apps to be back on the App Store.

— Pavel Durov (@durov) February 1, 2018

我們被Apple警告向用戶提供了不適當內容，兩款App都已從App Store下架。一旦我們找到了保護措施，我們希望這款App可以重回App Store。

—— Pavel Durov (@durov) 2018年2月1日

Report

On technology news site TechCrunch, Natasha Lomas speculated the new app could have fallen foul of Apple guidelines requiring all apps to have filtering and blocking systems as well as ways for offensive content to be removed quickly.

調查

在科技新聞站點TechCrunch上，娜塔莎·洛馬斯推測新的App可能違反了蘋果的條款，該條款要求所有App都必須有攔截、過濾系統，並且保證有方法可以快速刪除冒犯性內容。

Telegram has been criticised by some governments for using end-to-end encryption that protects communication between users.

Telegram因為使用了點對點加密技術保護用戶的交流，受到一些政府批評。

Some law enforcement agencies have complained this data-scrambling technique can make it hard to investigate some complex cases.

一些執法機構抱怨這種數字擾亂技術增加了複雜案件的調查難度。

But earlier this week, a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation for the UK government called the technology a "desirable fact of life".

但這周早些時候，英國政府的前恐怖主義立法評論家把這項技術稱為「生活中值得擁有的存在」。

It did make some aspects of an investigation more difficult, but this was offset by the huge amount of information available from other generally less well protected sources, David Anderson added.

大衛·安德森補充道，它確實在某些方面增加了調查難度，但這一點可以被其他普遍沒有受到良好保護的信息所抵消。

。

。

。

文編 / Cassidy

美編 / Isaac

喜歡這篇文章嗎？立刻分享出去讓更多人知道吧！